3 ms·
I'll just leave this here. DOSing Visa and Mastercard is one thing, espionage is something very different. USC Title 18 § 794 Gathering or delivering defense
by DrJokepu 15y ago
I'll just leave this here. DOSing Visa and Mastercard is one thing, espionage is something very different.
USC Title 18 § 794
Gathering or delivering defense information to aid foreign government
Whoever, with intent or reason to believe that it is to be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation, communicates, delivers, or transmits, or attempts to communicate, deliver, or transmit, to any foreign government, or to any faction or party or military or naval force within a foreign country, whether recognized or unrecognized by the United States, or to any representative, officer, agent, employee, subject, or citizen thereof, either directly or indirectly, any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, note, instrument, appliance, or information relating to the national defense, shall be punished by death or by imprisonment for any term of years or for life, except that the sentence of death shall not be imposed unless the jury or, if there is no jury, the court, further finds that the offense resulted in the identification by a foreign power (as defined in section 101(a) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978) of an individual acting as an agent of the United States and consequently in the death of that individual, or directly concerned nuclear weaponry, military spacecraft or satellites, early warning systems, or other means of defense or retaliation against large-scale attack; war plans; communications intelligence or cryptographic information; or any other major weapons system or major element of defense strategy.
- scythe 15y ago>Whoever, with intent or reason to believe that it is to be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation I don't think this qualifies.
- DrJokepu 15y ago> reason to believe that it is to be used to the injury of the United States I think it does. I'm no lawyer, however.
- scythe 15y agoI don't know, maybe in the most trivial "if it wasn't going to cause a problem, why were they hiding it?" sort of way. But it's not "reason to believe it could be used", it's "reason to believe it was to be used". That is, Anonymous would have to have thought that the Internet intends to use this to hurt the United States, that the people to whom they deliver the information -- people like you and I -- intend to harm the US. Not that they could, but that they would. Harming the US is not among my goals, nor is it among the goals of most people who will see the documents. That's where I think it gets up in the air. I don't think most Anons want to start a war, they just want the American people to protest government secrecy. Bradley Manning didn't get hit with "delivering defense information to aid foreign government" and considering the amount of egg he got on the military's face I'm sure they would've liked to.