4 ms·

This is strange to me. I have lived in big cities for my adult life (San Francisco and Los Angeles), and I have never experienced any crime.

bombcar 5y ago
The thing to look for is evidence of protections against crime - barred windows and high walls, locked garages vs street parking, hotels and businesses with security vs everything just open, having to get a key for the bathroom vs it just being there, etc. It’s like COVID-19- there’s no use in pretending it doesn’t exist because I nor anyone I know well has had it.
- HarryHirsch 5y ago
  You do wonder about all these walled communities in places like Richardson and Plano, TX. What are they defending against? When you walk around the area there was no evidence of crime or disorderly behaviour, yet they still had that strange architecture. So what are they defending against?
  - bombcar 5y ago
    Outsiders. They don’t want anyone wandering around.
- micromacrofoot 5y ago
  The way people prioritize the perceived risk of crime is incredibly overblown, largely due to politics and how the Republican/Democrat rural/urban divide is so heavily propagandized. Wyoming's homicide rate is 4.4 per 100,000... NYC's homicide rate is 5.5 per 100,000... Los Angeles' homicide rate is 6.2 per 100,000... Mississippi's homicide rate is 11.2 per 100,000... Chicago's homicide rate is 18.26 per 100,000... There are differences... but it's not as clearly urban/rural as it's made out to be. Economic factors seem more relevant as far as I can tell. Of course there are also other types of crime to consider, but homicide is the common fear. Meanwhile... National rate of death from car accidents is 11 per 100,000... Death rate from obesity-related cancers is 54.9 per 100,000... Yet very few people seem to advocate for more walkable rural towns or reducing the amount they drive.
truncj 5y ago
Not saying either side's sweeping statement is correct, but "if it hasn't happened to me, its not a problem" mentality is less than productive.
- cortesoft 5y ago
  Sure, but the person I responded to was giving an anecdote, so I responded with one.

bombcar 5y ago

The thing to look for is evidence of protections against crime - barred windows and high walls, locked garages vs street parking, hotels and businesses with security vs everything just open, having to get a key for the bathroom vs it just being there, etc. It’s like COVID-19- there’s no use in pretending it doesn’t exist because I nor anyone I know well has had it.

HarryHirsch 5y ago
You do wonder about all these walled communities in places like Richardson and Plano, TX. What are they defending against? When you walk around the area there was no evidence of crime or disorderly behaviour, yet they still had that strange architecture. So what are they defending against?
- bombcar 5y ago
  Outsiders. They don’t want anyone wandering around.
micromacrofoot 5y ago
The way people prioritize the perceived risk of crime is incredibly overblown, largely due to politics and how the Republican/Democrat rural/urban divide is so heavily propagandized. Wyoming's homicide rate is 4.4 per 100,000... NYC's homicide rate is 5.5 per 100,000... Los Angeles' homicide rate is 6.2 per 100,000... Mississippi's homicide rate is 11.2 per 100,000... Chicago's homicide rate is 18.26 per 100,000... There are differences... but it's not as clearly urban/rural as it's made out to be. Economic factors seem more relevant as far as I can tell. Of course there are also other types of crime to consider, but homicide is the common fear. Meanwhile... National rate of death from car accidents is 11 per 100,000... Death rate from obesity-related cancers is 54.9 per 100,000... Yet very few people seem to advocate for more walkable rural towns or reducing the amount they drive.

truncj 5y ago

Not saying either side's sweeping statement is correct, but "if it hasn't happened to me, its not a problem" mentality is less than productive.

cortesoft 5y ago
Sure, but the person I responded to was giving an anecdote, so I responded with one.