30 ms·
I agree - I'd also be opposed. I understand why it frustrates people (especially in the cases such as iDOS 2), but it was a known factor for me buying an Apple
by TomAnthony 5y ago
I agree - I'd also be opposed. I understand why it frustrates people (especially in the cases such as iDOS 2), but it was a known factor for me buying an Apple phone. More importantly, it was an aspect of the ecosystem that I _wanted_.
On Android the Play Store is a major distributor of malware [1]. I would like to avoid that, which comes with trade-offs, which I accept. Is it perfect? No. But it works.
I do wonder if there is a path where iOS can be completely replaced by a third party OS, so iPhones can be used in a way to allow you to install anything you want, but it is no longer Apple's 'responsibility'. However, that also comes with its own set of problems.
[1] https://www.zdnet.com/article/play-store-identified-as-main-distribution-vector-for-most-android-malware/ https://www.zdnet.com/article/play-store-identified-as-main-...
- mgsk 5y agoYou know you wouldn't have to make use of functionality just because it's there, right?
- TomAnthony 5y agoYes, I understand that, but how do I _know_ if I am using this functionality? In this case, it is the ability for an app to install and execute arbitrary code that hasn't been reviewed. I download an update to DoodleJump and it installs some malware on my device. I'd be none the wiser. I don't want that stress, which is why I chose an Apple device. It protects me from that scenario.
- johnny53169 5y ago> Yes, I understand that, but how do I _know_ if I am using this functionality? Go look at your settings? As the recent leaks showed, the walled garden didn't protect you from invisible malware