4 ms·
No, that's the opposite, read the followup: https://twitter.com/TechEmails/status/1418259351140188166?s=20 https://twitter.com/TechEmails/status/141825935114018
by zokier 5y ago
No, that's the opposite, read the followup: https://twitter.com/TechEmails/status/1418259351140188166?s=20 https://twitter.com/TechEmails/status/1418259351140188166?s=...
- hdjjhhvvhga 5y agoWhen reading his reply[0] it's obvious he was right in the original email when he said he saw no solution to this problem. They even tried to start from scratch and the result was still arguably the worst Windows edition ever. [0] http://web.archive.org/web/20070107170621/http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsvista/archive/2006/12/12/title.aspx http://web.archive.org/web/20070107170621/http://windowsvist...
- pvitz 5y agoIn my opinion, Windows ME was worse. I decided to use Windows 2000 and then XP. 2000 was very stable compared to what we were used to with the 95/98 series.
- some-guy 5y agoI'll be honest, I didn't notice many differences between Windows 7 and Windows Vista SP1. I agree Windows Vista was absolutely terrible when it came out, but so was XP. And so was 98. And 95.
- Razengan 5y agoThe follow up is basically “oops I shouldn’t have been caught thinking that out loud” I mean he’s calling Vista a “phenomenal product”, for Fourier’s sake