3 ms·
I think this situation/comments have been blown out of proportion a bit. To me, the situation reads more like: Muse Group have held back on litigating over cop
by dkdbejwi383 5y ago
I think this situation/comments have been blown out of proportion a bit.
To me, the situation reads more like: Muse Group have held back on litigating over copyright infringement (whether that is a valid claim or not) because they are aware of the alleged infringer's precarious political situation, however they've turned a blind eye for too long and are now in a difficult position where they either lose money where they are paying for licences for content that this developer has allegedly stolen, or they litigate to protect their interest and risk having the guy deported.
It seems like they're just trying to be frank and level with the guy.
Maybe it's just that text isn't the best way to get this message across, or the CPO's communication style doesn't work for some folks.
But I don't think it's like an "offer you can't refuse" mobster tactic as some would like to claim.
- meowface 5y agoI wrote a more lengthy comment about it here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27927878 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27927878 In my opinion, even if you earnestly try to read it as charitably as possible and give full benefit of the doubt, it's still not good.