4 ms·
For those languages, I don't really see a need to paremtrize types on values. Because of the AMAZING generics support. But that may just be the blub paradox [1
by Akronymus 5y ago
For those languages, I don't really see a need to paremtrize types on values. Because of the AMAZING generics support.
But that may just be the blub paradox [1] in action
[1] https://wiki.c2.com/?BlubParadox https://wiki.c2.com/?BlubParadox
- qalmakka 5y agoWell the fact you couldn't reasonably use arrays without Generic Const hit stable in Rust 1.51 says otherwise. Defining templates on values is very useful, especially in C++ where you can provide template specializations. You can do a whole lot of metaprogramming and compile-time stuff that way.