3 ms·

It seems like you're conflating toilet paper being a product vs someone working being more like a service. A shop being out of stock does not in itself mean th

It seems like you're conflating toilet paper being a product vs someone working being more like a service. A shop being out of stock does not in itself mean there is a shortage. > The problem then isn't that toilet paper isn't available, its that its price becomes completely unethical > ... > That is massively different than what is going on here. We're talking about huge corporations that have spent years reducing their work force that want to increase their work for now and are upset that they can't get the same prices for labor as before It also seems like you're trying to moralize this when it's just about supply and demand.

dagenix 5y ago
> A shop being out of stock does not in itself mean there is a shortage. _A_ shop being out of stock doesn't mean that there is a shortage, but when all of them are it is. > It also seems like you're trying to moralize this when it's just about supply and demand I don't see how you can ignore the moral aspect - there is a massive difference between being able to afford toilet paper vs being able to hire workers at the rate that a corporation wants.
- ZephyrBlu 5y ago
  There's only a difference because you're moralizing it. If you look at it objectively, it's just supply and demand.