5 ms·
I'll rephrase the GP's question because I'm also curious, and I don't feel your response answered the question. Is there a signal which suggests that "public c
by gwerbret 5y ago
I'll rephrase the GP's question because I'm also curious, and I don't feel your response answered the question.
Is there a signal which suggests that "public creativity" equals "good engineer", particularly when the resume already speaks for itself? Or is it purely to compensate, as you suggest, for a possibly poor interview performance?
I'm honestly skeptical that such a signal exists (but can be convinced otherwise), except insofar that a person may be invited to give talks _because_ they have demonstrated strong engineering skills or talent -- whereupon, yet again, their resume should speak for itself.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- simonw 5y agoI don't believe that public creativity is required for a good engineer. I do believe that candidates with public creativity are more likely to make for a promising interview. Thinking back, I can't remember many cases where a candidate with some evidence of public creativity bombed the interview completely.