The scientific stakeholders aren’t proving themselves with an opaque public cloud API. They’re writing detailed research papers with data that go into peer revi

The scientific stakeholders aren’t proving themselves with an opaque public cloud API. They’re writing detailed research papers with data that go into peer reviewed journals. The data is pretty profoundly scrutinized by the community. If a scientist or company that purportedly does science doesn't do that, they’re not taken seriously by other members of the scientific community. No one is truly believed at face value. I don’t see any significant probability of bamboozling the community of scientists through abject fraud. And there hasn’t been any such issue yet. (There have been retracted published claims, but the retractions happened as a result of scientific scrutiny.)