6 ms·

My Startup project: ErrorKey.com, a tool for hackers.

60 points by okeumeni 18y ago

tstegart 18y ago
You've created a lot of these search things haven't you? What are you planning to do with them all? Any plan on trying to monetize, or are they all just projects for fun?
- okeumeni 18y ago
  Our primary goal is to build tools that people can use, and then we will focus more on the money side. By the way the previous engines are already bringing in money; they are fully using the power of affiliate marketing. Check them out: qwili.com, qhoga.com, karatr.com. Error key is a tool we build for hackers, ourselves it is more for a useful purpose than to make money.
  - mleonhard 18y ago
    Alas! http://qwili.com/Search/index.aspx?q=chu-hi&btnS=Search http://qwili.com/Search/index.aspx?q=chu-hi&btnS=Search http://qhoga.com/Search/index.aspx?q=gnomes&btnS=Search http://qhoga.com/Search/index.aspx?q=gnomes&btnS=Search http://karatr.com/Search/Index.aspx?q=replica+rolex&btnS=Search http://karatr.com/Search/Index.aspx?q=replica+rolex&btnS...
pongle 18y ago
Just a quick note: in your credits I think you mean to reference people's Trademarks, not Copyrights (you use the (c) instead of (tm))
- okeumeni 18y ago
  Right! We will fix that ASAP. Thanks for the remark.
  - Chocobean 18y ago
    I like the hints if no results are returned. this may sound more 'natural' though: Type fewer words Type Words with Correct Spelling with regards to "Try Different Word Combinations", I assume you mean the ordering of my search keywords ("apple pie" "pie apple")? If so, why does word ordering make a difference?
jlogic77 18y ago
Is it going to be better than just putting the code in a search engine like google or something. Most of the codes I come across are unique enough that I get a direct match pretty quickly. Also what helps me is seeing related forum posts and other comments on resolving the issue, the definition in on itself is often useless.
- okeumeni 18y ago
  Depending on the system your working on finding a fix or explanation to an error is not always easy. The next step is to allow users to post alternative fix to errors or link to forum where research can be extended.
- ericb 18y ago
  I have nothing to do with the site or author, but I can suggest the following: -Google defaults to under-emphasizing results related to errors specific in newer versions of software. So when a bug in a new release comes out, info is often no where to be seen--it is obscured by older items with higher rank. -Google includes links to both questions, and answers. I only want answers. -Google's results are across multiple pages and obscured in forum discussions. I want one page with all the answers and info. -Google frequently returns results from experts exchange, which involves scrolling to the bottom. Additionally, I've talked to developers who don't even realize the unobscured answer is at the bottom. -Some code queries do not translate well into regular searches because the characters have meaning. Off the top of my head example: select * from blah -There is not always a nice centralized place to go to share it with the world know when you have a fix. That said, I'm not sure this site implements solutions to all these problems, but a wiki-type site could. Isn't Jeff Atwood doing something with a similar idea?
richtaur 18y ago
Honestly I think getting into the search market is a waste of time. Too many fish in the sea, and too many sea monsters. Also: why no API? :)
- okeumeni 18y ago
  API is a great Idea thanks for the hint. : )
aasarava 18y ago
I like the idea and think it will be powerful once you allow users to post info on how they resolved the errors. But Splunk already does this, no? Will this provide any new / easier / cheaper features?
- okeumeni 18y ago
  I don’t think Splunk is an error search engine.
  - Hexstream 18y ago
    It's a server log aggregation and analysis thing...
  - aasarava 18y ago
    I stand corrected. I was thinking of how Splunk lets you search all your own logs for a specific error code. But I see how your use case is different.
maxklein 18y ago
entering E_ERROR gives wierd results. If I were you, I'd save all searches, create a static page for that result and index it in google. Since you're an affiliate marketer...
- okeumeni 18y ago
  Good Idea, Thanks. BTW we are not affiliate marketers; we build engines that leverage the power of affiliate marketing to deliver fairly good product search.
  - maxklein 18y ago
    What may want to do is this (for all your search properties): Let's say I am a user and I search for "Will Smith". I receive some results. I then search for "Will Smith Pictures". I receive more results. I then search for "Will Smith Pictures No Shirt". What has happened is that I received results that were not relevant, so I refined or changed my search till I found the item I was looking for. So, my idea is that when you have a particular session searching, you aggregate the follow up queries for each search, and display them at the top of the search results to keep the users longer on your site and push more ads. Because in most cases, users will not click, but in about 10% of cases, the user will see something that he had not previously wanted to search for, but now wants to search for. For example, I search for "Angelina Jolie", and as "recommended search" I see "Angelina Jolie affair with Max Klein", I would be curious to learn more about the affair Angelina had with this mysterious and probably dashingly handsome Max Klein, so I basically double my interaction with your site.
bkmrkr 18y ago
Great Idea!!! bookmarked.
philh 18y ago
First thought is that this seems to be much the same as http://bug.gd http://bug.gd, except without the email thing. This is probably a good thing, if your results are good enough quality.
deleted 18y ago
[deleted]
thorax 18y ago
I like the idea! I like it so much that our startup last year targetted the same general audience with a custom error search engine: http://bug.gd http://bug.gd http://bug.gd/info/faq http://bug.gd/info/faq We've only grabbed error codes where we can find/recommend a solution, but when it comes from crawlers we always link to the source as well to avoid copyright issues. How are you working around that in your case? Are they coming from local sources rather than websites? (Admittedly, I doubt these companies are too worried about their error documentation being quoted in full.) Best of luck to you! I like to see more attention to this area, no doubt.
- cmars232 18y ago
  Despite the benign assurances of the site, having to type my email address in bug.gd is annoying. I disagree with "forcing community participation" like this... how do I even know there would even be enough content on your site to make it worth my time?
  - thorax 18y ago
    As much as I love hearing feedback (thanks!), I don't really want to get a side thread going about our site in this other team's thread. Not really fair to them. As briefly as I can: The Firefox extension allows anonymous search/contribution. Stay tuned for changes more to your liking in our next site release.
  - delano 18y ago
    You could suggest that they change their approach in getting the email address but the concept of reminding you to reply with your fix to that error is good.
    - cmars232 18y ago
      I completely agree, its a good feature if its optional.
cmars232 18y ago
I know this is a really new project, and I would love to find a better way to search for errors... but how are you going to avoid "pulling a Cuil"? The Search For : NullPointerException did not match any document in the system For best Result: * Type less words * Type Words Correct Spelling * Try Different Word Combinations * Search the internet
- okeumeni 18y ago
  Please send us your search suggestion to ErrorKey at intelliverb dot com. Tell us what system you want us to research on, let’s build this together thanks.
  - LeMadChef 18y ago
    Is it possible to log all search queries that return 0 (or less than x) results, then report on that every day/week/month? Would minimize the "I can't find xyz" type of feedback that you may or may not get.
- deleted 18y ago
  [deleted]
- sh1mmer 18y ago
  I love that phrase "Pulling a Cuil". Lol.
DanielBMarkham 18y ago
I've been using Google for this for a very, very long time. Can you describe to me why I would want to come to your site next time I had an error?
- josefresco 18y ago
  Error codes, without all the other crap (bullshit paid forums, AOL nation posts) is reason enough for me.
  - ghiotion 18y ago
    Absolutely. I can't tell you how friggin' sick I am of inadvertently clicking on an "Experts Exchange" link in a google search set. The microsecond it takes my eyes to register an EE site and click back is one too many. I'm pretty sure EE owes me about 10 years of my life up to this point.
    - huhtenberg 18y ago
      Member-only EE content is visible in Google's cached version of their pages. Just scroll to the bottom part of the page to see it. E.g.: http://209.85.141.104/search?q=cache:gRw9sjavhVAJ:www.experts-exchange.com/OS/Microsoft_Operating_Systems/Windows/XP/Q_21692879.html%3Fqid%3D21692879 http://209.85.141.104/search?q=cache:gRw9sjavhVAJ:www.expert...
      - jonknee 18y ago
        It's available from the regular version of the page too--just scroll to the bottom like you do on the cache: http://www.experts-exchange.com/OS/Microsoft_Operating_Systems/Windows/XP/Q_21692879.html?qid=21692879 http://www.experts-exchange.com/OS/Microsoft_Operating_Syste...
        OpenMIKE 18y ago
        Not for me. This 'trick' stopped working for me about a month ago, so now I have to use the cache links.
chollida1 18y ago
I'm not sure how it works but 0xC0000005 works and 0x00000000C0000005 does not. Is the site 64bit friendly?
rubentopo 18y ago
Interesting, try getting exceptions as well, that might be useful for debugging purposes.
rams 18y ago
While working on a project about five years back using mainly Microsoft technologies, I discovered that there were a few consultants who had built their business around Windows error messages. Maybe you need to focus on the right segment of this market ;-)
- eru 18y ago
  Who hired their service?
pchivers 18y ago
http://www.errorkey.com/Search/Index.aspx?q=NoSuchError&btnS=Search http://www.errorkey.com/Search/Index.aspx?q=NoSuchError&... Ugh, this error message is filled with errors and definitely needs copy editing. My best attempt: The search for "NoSuchError" did not match any documents in the system. For best results: * Type fewer words * Make sure you are using the correct spelling * Try different word combinations * Search the internet (???)
derefr 18y ago
I think the real solution here is microformats, to be plugged into bug trackers and knowledge bases. Then something like this would be possible (just mocked it up myself): http://derefr.googlepages.com/google_errors.png http://derefr.googlepages.com/google_errors.png

60 points by okeumeni 18y ago

You've created a lot of these search things haven't you? What are you planning to do with them all? Any plan on trying to monetize, or are they all just projects for fun?

okeumeni 18y ago
Our primary goal is to build tools that people can use, and then we will focus more on the money side. By the way the previous engines are already bringing in money; they are fully using the power of affiliate marketing. Check them out: qwili.com, qhoga.com, karatr.com. Error key is a tool we build for hackers, ourselves it is more for a useful purpose than to make money.
- mleonhard 18y ago
  Alas! http://qwili.com/Search/index.aspx?q=chu-hi&btnS=Search http://qwili.com/Search/index.aspx?q=chu-hi&btnS=Search http://qhoga.com/Search/index.aspx?q=gnomes&btnS=Search http://qhoga.com/Search/index.aspx?q=gnomes&btnS=Search http://karatr.com/Search/Index.aspx?q=replica+rolex&btnS=Search http://karatr.com/Search/Index.aspx?q=replica+rolex&btnS...

pongle 18y ago

Just a quick note: in your credits I think you mean to reference people's Trademarks, not Copyrights (you use the (c) instead of (tm))

okeumeni 18y ago
Right! We will fix that ASAP. Thanks for the remark.
- Chocobean 18y ago
  I like the hints if no results are returned. this may sound more 'natural' though: Type fewer words Type Words with Correct Spelling with regards to "Try Different Word Combinations", I assume you mean the ordering of my search keywords ("apple pie" "pie apple")? If so, why does word ordering make a difference?

jlogic77 18y ago

Is it going to be better than just putting the code in a search engine like google or something. Most of the codes I come across are unique enough that I get a direct match pretty quickly. Also what helps me is seeing related forum posts and other comments on resolving the issue, the definition in on itself is often useless.

okeumeni 18y ago
Depending on the system your working on finding a fix or explanation to an error is not always easy. The next step is to allow users to post alternative fix to errors or link to forum where research can be extended.
ericb 18y ago
I have nothing to do with the site or author, but I can suggest the following: -Google defaults to under-emphasizing results related to errors specific in newer versions of software. So when a bug in a new release comes out, info is often no where to be seen--it is obscured by older items with higher rank. -Google includes links to both questions, and answers. I only want answers. -Google's results are across multiple pages and obscured in forum discussions. I want one page with all the answers and info. -Google frequently returns results from experts exchange, which involves scrolling to the bottom. Additionally, I've talked to developers who don't even realize the unobscured answer is at the bottom. -Some code queries do not translate well into regular searches because the characters have meaning. Off the top of my head example: select * from blah -There is not always a nice centralized place to go to share it with the world know when you have a fix. That said, I'm not sure this site implements solutions to all these problems, but a wiki-type site could. Isn't Jeff Atwood doing something with a similar idea?

richtaur 18y ago

Honestly I think getting into the search market is a waste of time. Too many fish in the sea, and too many sea monsters. Also: why no API? :)

okeumeni 18y ago
API is a great Idea thanks for the hint. : )

aasarava 18y ago

I like the idea and think it will be powerful once you allow users to post info on how they resolved the errors. But Splunk already does this, no? Will this provide any new / easier / cheaper features?

okeumeni 18y ago
I don’t think Splunk is an error search engine.
- Hexstream 18y ago
  It's a server log aggregation and analysis thing...
- aasarava 18y ago
  I stand corrected. I was thinking of how Splunk lets you search all your own logs for a specific error code. But I see how your use case is different.

maxklein 18y ago

entering E_ERROR gives wierd results. If I were you, I'd save all searches, create a static page for that result and index it in google. Since you're an affiliate marketer...

okeumeni 18y ago
Good Idea, Thanks. BTW we are not affiliate marketers; we build engines that leverage the power of affiliate marketing to deliver fairly good product search.
- maxklein 18y ago
  What may want to do is this (for all your search properties): Let's say I am a user and I search for "Will Smith". I receive some results. I then search for "Will Smith Pictures". I receive more results. I then search for "Will Smith Pictures No Shirt". What has happened is that I received results that were not relevant, so I refined or changed my search till I found the item I was looking for. So, my idea is that when you have a particular session searching, you aggregate the follow up queries for each search, and display them at the top of the search results to keep the users longer on your site and push more ads. Because in most cases, users will not click, but in about 10% of cases, the user will see something that he had not previously wanted to search for, but now wants to search for. For example, I search for "Angelina Jolie", and as "recommended search" I see "Angelina Jolie affair with Max Klein", I would be curious to learn more about the affair Angelina had with this mysterious and probably dashingly handsome Max Klein, so I basically double my interaction with your site.

bkmrkr 18y ago

Great Idea!!! bookmarked.

philh 18y ago

First thought is that this seems to be much the same as http://bug.gd http://bug.gd, except without the email thing. This is probably a good thing, if your results are good enough quality.

deleted 18y ago

[deleted]

thorax 18y ago

I like the idea! I like it so much that our startup last year targetted the same general audience with a custom error search engine: http://bug.gd http://bug.gd http://bug.gd/info/faq http://bug.gd/info/faq We've only grabbed error codes where we can find/recommend a solution, but when it comes from crawlers we always link to the source as well to avoid copyright issues. How are you working around that in your case? Are they coming from local sources rather than websites? (Admittedly, I doubt these companies are too worried about their error documentation being quoted in full.) Best of luck to you! I like to see more attention to this area, no doubt.

cmars232 18y ago
Despite the benign assurances of the site, having to type my email address in bug.gd is annoying. I disagree with "forcing community participation" like this... how do I even know there would even be enough content on your site to make it worth my time?
- thorax 18y ago
  As much as I love hearing feedback (thanks!), I don't really want to get a side thread going about our site in this other team's thread. Not really fair to them. As briefly as I can: The Firefox extension allows anonymous search/contribution. Stay tuned for changes more to your liking in our next site release.
- delano 18y ago
  You could suggest that they change their approach in getting the email address but the concept of reminding you to reply with your fix to that error is good.
  - cmars232 18y ago
    I completely agree, its a good feature if its optional.

cmars232 18y ago

I know this is a really new project, and I would love to find a better way to search for errors... but how are you going to avoid "pulling a Cuil"? The Search For : NullPointerException did not match any document in the system For best Result: * Type less words * Type Words Correct Spelling * Try Different Word Combinations * Search the internet

okeumeni 18y ago
Please send us your search suggestion to ErrorKey at intelliverb dot com. Tell us what system you want us to research on, let’s build this together thanks.
- LeMadChef 18y ago
  Is it possible to log all search queries that return 0 (or less than x) results, then report on that every day/week/month? Would minimize the "I can't find xyz" type of feedback that you may or may not get.
deleted 18y ago
[deleted]
sh1mmer 18y ago
I love that phrase "Pulling a Cuil". Lol.

DanielBMarkham 18y ago

I've been using Google for this for a very, very long time. Can you describe to me why I would want to come to your site next time I had an error?

josefresco 18y ago
Error codes, without all the other crap (bullshit paid forums, AOL nation posts) is reason enough for me.
- ghiotion 18y ago
  Absolutely. I can't tell you how friggin' sick I am of inadvertently clicking on an "Experts Exchange" link in a google search set. The microsecond it takes my eyes to register an EE site and click back is one too many. I'm pretty sure EE owes me about 10 years of my life up to this point.
  - huhtenberg 18y ago
    Member-only EE content is visible in Google's cached version of their pages. Just scroll to the bottom part of the page to see it. E.g.: http://209.85.141.104/search?q=cache:gRw9sjavhVAJ:www.experts-exchange.com/OS/Microsoft_Operating_Systems/Windows/XP/Q_21692879.html%3Fqid%3D21692879 http://209.85.141.104/search?q=cache:gRw9sjavhVAJ:www.expert...
    - jonknee 18y ago
      It's available from the regular version of the page too--just scroll to the bottom like you do on the cache: http://www.experts-exchange.com/OS/Microsoft_Operating_Systems/Windows/XP/Q_21692879.html?qid=21692879 http://www.experts-exchange.com/OS/Microsoft_Operating_Syste...
      - OpenMIKE 18y ago
        Not for me. This 'trick' stopped working for me about a month ago, so now I have to use the cache links.

chollida1 18y ago

I'm not sure how it works but 0xC0000005 works and 0x00000000C0000005 does not. Is the site 64bit friendly?

rubentopo 18y ago

Interesting, try getting exceptions as well, that might be useful for debugging purposes.

rams 18y ago

While working on a project about five years back using mainly Microsoft technologies, I discovered that there were a few consultants who had built their business around Windows error messages. Maybe you need to focus on the right segment of this market ;-)

eru 18y ago
Who hired their service?

pchivers 18y ago

http://www.errorkey.com/Search/Index.aspx?q=NoSuchError&btnS=Search http://www.errorkey.com/Search/Index.aspx?q=NoSuchError&... Ugh, this error message is filled with errors and definitely needs copy editing. My best attempt: The search for "NoSuchError" did not match any documents in the system. For best results: * Type fewer words * Make sure you are using the correct spelling * Try different word combinations * Search the internet (???)

derefr 18y ago

I think the real solution here is microformats, to be plugged into bug trackers and knowledge bases. Then something like this would be possible (just mocked it up myself): http://derefr.googlepages.com/google_errors.png http://derefr.googlepages.com/google_errors.png