3 ms·
I'm not sure that's true. We invest a lot of money in making people productive at their jobs, basically 0-25, and then they only work another 40 years after tha
by epicureanideal 5y ago
I'm not sure that's true. We invest a lot of money in making people productive at their jobs, basically 0-25, and then they only work another 40 years after that. If they could work another 60-80 years instead, the return on investment is much better.
- cptaj 5y agoI think he means under the current life expectancy and quality of life in the final decades. He probably means those final decades are completely unproductive and taxing on the whole economy, so a productive person dying just before becoming unproductive would be optimal. Naturally, if you give people more productive years then it changes.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]