3 ms·
I doubt that's why they are allergic to it. Perhaps I'm projecting, but I suspect that developers have seen their fair share of products which succeed (for som
by dnautics 5y ago
I doubt that's why they are allergic to it. Perhaps I'm projecting, but I suspect that developers have seen their fair share of products which succeed (for some measure of succeed, e.g. "raised a round" or "founders cashed out") with only marketing and a crap or, worse, vaporware product. It's a very common and easy fallacious inference to go from there to "all marketing is bad", especially in a field where there are a handful of success stories (e.g. craigslist) where the success was built with very little or no marketing, and "the product spoke for itself".
- brianwawok 5y agoMarketing on a bad product sometimes lets you make money. No marketing on a good product seldom lets you be successful. The mistake of founders is to let burns from the first bucket, stop the second from having a chance.
- dnautics 5y agoThat's a paraphrase of what I wrote