4 ms·
Respectfully I remain unconvinced of your argument. There’s enough in the media about the vaccine, and enough outreach to vulnerable populations, but at this po
by underseacables 5y ago
Respectfully I remain unconvinced of your argument. There’s enough in the media about the vaccine, and enough outreach to vulnerable populations, but at this point if you are not able to get the vaccine, there’s something else going on. I feel like maybe you’re trying to link this to voter laws or something, and that is just not a comparison that can be made in the situation.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- mumblemumble 5y ago> there’s something else going on Seems likely. And here we have articles talking about real researchers doing real research, as scientifically as they can, to try and pin down what those other factors might be. And you are rejecting it, not based on its own merits as research, but based on a mix of sweeping statements and political assertions. Here I just pointed out that your most recent argument doesn't follow because it's a blatant strawman, and your response is to suggest that me pointing out that the universal and existential quantifiers are actually two very different logical constructs is somehow an encrypted 4D chess statement about voter laws? Allow me to suggest that life has a distressing tendency to be neither that simple nor that complicated.