3 ms·
That would be fine if the assumption wasn't based upon thousands of content creators, who are also sharing their work for free, most who unknowingly were buildi
by winternett 5y ago
That would be fine if the assumption wasn't based upon thousands of content creators, who are also sharing their work for free, most who unknowingly were building Facebook and other sites into popularity through their work for no pay, that now have the rug pulled out from under their ability to be seen.
Now, on top of creators that drive Facebook's most interesting content while contributing their music, stories, and videos etc. (for no profit) Creators have to pay to run promo ads for visibility even among people who previously followed them for updates, while Facebook collects the profit from all that work.
The model was broken by greed, not by a desire to connect people better nor to do good.