It’s not just about a game of chess being moderated. It’s about silencing legitimate speech that you disagree with, whether it’s on a factual level or other mo

It’s not just about a game of chess being moderated. It’s about silencing legitimate speech that you disagree with, whether it’s on a factual level or other motivations. Perfect example, coronavirus being manufactured in a lab rather than originating in the wild. Anyone that suggested it was from a lab has been moderated heavily until a report came out that in fact it did. Was this not damaging to society? And to your point of hate speech, can you give me a definition of the term? You can’t because there isn’t one that a) covers all scenarios and, more importantly, b) doesn’t cover legitimate speech. It is up to me to think for myself, not up to someone else to do it for me.