4 ms·
He was attacking a youth camp and shot many young teens(I didn’t read every slide but one example I saw was a 14 YO girl hit four times) so I don’t see a differ
by neither_color 5y ago
He was attacking a youth camp and shot many young teens(I didn’t read every slide but one example I saw was a 14 YO girl hit four times) so I don’t see a difference. I guess I’m just shocked at seeing a weird attempt at “ethics” from someone who would do something like that.
- mensetmanusman 5y agoIn the ethics of evil, one can see that even evil acts are done for some false sense of ‘good’ by the doer.
- meowface 5y agoBreivik likely saw himself as a very ethical and virtuous individuals. His reasoning there doesn't surprise me. He and some other mass killers may even feel as though they have a stronger personal code of ethics than most people. Their ethical philosophies and stances are just unfathomably twisted and corrupted, not unlike how cancer cells behave as if they're functioning rightfully.
- magicalhippo 5y agoWhat he did was horrible and evil, but it was also extremely calculated and carefully planned. He knew full well what he did. For example, he researched which drugs he could take that would make it easier for him to shoot the kids[1]. He was not insane. He wasn't on a wild rampage. He had a specific goal in mind: to destroy the future of the labour party. [1]: https://www.aftenposten.no/norge/i/QJRjP/behring-breivik-var-paavirket-av-rusmidler https://www.aftenposten.no/norge/i/QJRjP/behring-breivik-var...
- GoblinSlayer 5y agoHe believes it's wrong to kill children, not teens. The age of 12 is approximately when people go from childhood to adolescence.