3 ms·
I like the name. The website is pretty clear. But like another commenter it wasn't obvious that you have this complex UI builder. It seemed more like a template
by escot 5y ago
I like the name. The website is pretty clear. But like another commenter it wasn't obvious that you have this complex UI builder. It seemed more like a template library.
As a developer my first concern is about the quality and maintainability of the code. If I can't write the code to begin with, then I won't be able to maintain it either. What might be interesting to me is a component generator instead of a whole site generator. For example if I want to make a list with a search box, I could see using a GUI to scaffold this out, download the skeleton code, and then fill it out from there. But I'm not sure I would pay for the service.
It looks from the tutorial that you handle firebase integration on the backend. But when I skimmed your landing page my impression was that it just generated the code to interact with firebase, but didnt manage a firebase acct etc. That actually is pretty cool if you provide end to end management and hosting of the server that talks to firebase.
Congratulations on getting a quote from the CTO of Stripe. I would feature that higher up on the landing page.
Who are your target users? If they are developers looking for great React code then I would feature more example code snippets. If its non technical folks who want a basic marketing page or simple sass product then I wouldn't feature React as a selling point and instead focus on things like ease of use, page load speed, etc (where React may be irrelevant or a negative).
My project is knotend (there's a top level comment) if you have time to try it out.