3 ms·
At least according to the article, the crime in question was conspiring to swat him. Nothing particularly new here. That's generally how you convict people who
by mumblemumble 5y ago
At least according to the article, the crime in question was conspiring to swat him.
Nothing particularly new here. That's generally how you convict people who get other people to do their dirty work.
- dragontamer 5y agoThere's a fair number of people complaining about the law setting him at 60-months in prison. Well, the __solution__ is to talk about how we should rewrite the law. To rewrite the law, we should first understand this case entirely. This is just one man in an entire conspiracy group who seemed to seek profits from conducting ransom attacks. If you don't pay a ransom, you'll be doxxed and somebody out there will probably SWAT you for fun. There's levels of indirection here, as if they're trying to minimize the hit they'll take as they go to jail. And it seems largely successful. So the next step is to start making proposals for how the law should be written (and then to get those drafts to the lawmakers). This is a non-political issue that won't really get stuck. I'm simply trying to start the political process and law crafting needed to fix this problem in the future. Is the problem on Discord for having unsupervised meetup spots where these kinds of conspiracies can grow? How do people join groups like this? Is there a way we can get the Police to attack these groups before further incidents come out? Etc. etc.