3 ms·
This is a very poor article. Much better reporting can be found in the previously discussed article here (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27902214 https://
by requin246 5y ago
This is a very poor article. Much better reporting can be found in the previously discussed article here (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27902214 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27902214) or at the original source (https://www.pillarcatholic.com/p/pillar-investigates-usccb-gen-sec https://www.pillarcatholic.com/p/pillar-investigates-usccb-g...).
The article frames this as a priest being outed for his sexual preferences but that is a terribly warped perspective.
This priest, as all Catholic priests do, _voluntarily_ took a life long vow to abstain from any sexual relations. He was wantonly breaking that while hiding it from his community. Worse, he was literally on the committee creating regulations to discipline other priests for violations against that very same vow he was breaking. It’s always sad to see a man not live up to his own convictions, but this was a particularly egregious case of hypocrisy as well. It would have been much better for him to withdraw from public life once he knew he couldn’t keep his vows.
This is not an instance of an innocent man being outed. It’s a case of a man committing canonical crimes who got caught via anonymized location data. I am worried about some of the future implications as the article states, but what happened in this instance is a good thing.
- Apocryphon 5y agoThis article elides over the specifics of the victim in question, or the Substack medium that had dove into his personal life, but it keeps the prime focus on the dangers of (meta)data collection being used to doxx individuals. I say that it succeeds on that front, while leaving the sordid details for those other articles to cover. The importance is the issue, of which this incident is but a case study.