FTA: > In her suit, Viola acknowledged writing most of the posts I'm as pro-free-speech as the next person, but looking at the evidence[0] I frankly don't und

FTA: > In her suit, Viola acknowledged writing most of the posts I'm as pro-free-speech as the next person, but looking at the evidence[0] I frankly don't understand on what leg Viola is hoping to stand. If I understand this right, she's claiming she is the person behind the truthseeker username on Gateway Pundit, but that she didn't write a specific comment that was entered into evidence as being written by truthseeker? How does that not scream lying to evade responsibility? Also, IMHO, the repercussions on her job are not really relevant to the suit. Had Benton outed her for spamming pictures of unicorns, her job would've been just fine. It's her own alleged content that got her into hot water with her employer. Benton has no control over her employer's actions. [0] https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59725194/8/4/viola-v-benton/ https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59725194/8/4/viola-v-be... (page 5)