There's a large body of established case law that organizations do not have to bear the consequences of their employee's private lives, or continue their associ

There's a large body of established case law that organizations do not have to bear the consequences of their employee's private lives, or continue their association with an individual when that association is harmful to the organization. You're proposing an appealing ideal, but it's already contrary to a lot of existing decisions on the first amendment and balancing the competing rights of the different parties. In other words, you're stripping the rights of some to enhance the rights of others, which is rarely intended, but still something that has to be recognized.