If we're talking from the employers perspective, likely until it doesn't hit the bottom line. To make this discussion easier, lets consider just the comments i

If we're talking from the employers perspective, likely until it doesn't hit the bottom line. To make this discussion easier, lets consider just the comments in isloation, and assume they're all verified (like most would as an employer, to do otherwise would bring extra risk on yourself) If you're employing Muslims, then in this case, she's probably unemployable by you until she can demonstrate reform of some kind to an extent where both she and others in the workplace can collaborate effectively. However, as a journalist it depends on your outlet. Some may look at her conspiracism, and decide that to get to that point alone she's probably not a very good journalist and would again need to demonstrate some sort of pivot in her decision making that lead her to that point. On the other hand, there are probably some right wing outlets that would look at her and decide she's a great journalist based on those comments, and that her decision making is on point. Whether this is good or ideal is another matter. It comes down to how much you want the government involved in businesses ability to freely associate.