7 ms·
This reminds me of how the glaciers were supposed to be gone by 2020[1]. [1] https://lidblog.com/national-park-service-glaciers/ https://lidblog.com/national-p
by jb775 5y ago
This reminds me of how the glaciers were supposed to be gone by 2020[1].
[1] https://lidblog.com/national-park-service-glaciers/ https://lidblog.com/national-park-service-glaciers/
- D13Fd 5y agoAre you saying the aquifers aren't actually drying up? That Lake Mead and Lake Powell aren't actually at historic lows? This is talking about the facts on the ground today, not some projection of the future.
- WarOnPrivacy 5y agoHe's citing a source that's less reliable because it is compulsively agenda-driven - that is, a site that chooses it's conclusion first and then seeks out info appears to support it.
- downismorefun 5y agoAcross the board reductions in glacier size looks pretty grim to me https://www.usgs.gov/centers/norock/science/retreat-glaciers-glacier-national-park?qt-science_center_objects=1#qt-science_center_objects https://www.usgs.gov/centers/norock/science/retreat-glaciers...
- jdcaron 5y agoWorldwide glaciers are shrinking: https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-glacier-mass-balance https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/... I don't know about your example or your source. When you refer to climate changes, you can't use one local sample as your proof.