4 ms·
+56% vs the S&P's +36%. This does not look "suspicious", from a purely statistical point of view.
by kmonad 5y ago
+56% vs the S&P's +36%. This does not look "suspicious", from a purely statistical point of view.
- La1n 5y agoEspecially considering this is a multiple testing issue. When checking a lot of politicians there is likely going to be someone who is doing really well, even if it's just by chance. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_comparisons_problem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_comparisons_problem
- stonemetal12 5y agoAs a single data point I agree, I wonder if there is a long term view. Especially something that tracks before office, during office, after office.