3 ms·
> the trades don’t actually look suspicious nor requiring non-public information. The purchase was made 1 month before this story[1] broke, which was a signifi
by fighterpilot 5y ago
> the trades don’t actually look suspicious nor requiring non-public information.
The purchase was made 1 month before this story[1] broke, which was a significantly market moving announcement.
There's plausible deniability, of course.
[1] https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/25/biden-plans-to-replace-government-fleet-with-electric-vehicles.html https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/25/biden-plans-to-replace-gover...
- KerrickStaley 5y agoWhich purchase?
- boulos 5y agoSorry, which trade are you referring to? The Dec 22 TSLA options? Assuming yes, the disclosure report [1] says it was 25 calls with a strike price of $500 with expiration of 3/18/22 (so another long dated option). Tesla's share price that day was ~$650 [2] and the value of the 500 call went up (from ~$200 to $400) but has come right back down to ~$200 [3]. They have not exercised / sold the options (visit [4] and search for Pelosi in Filing Year 2021). [1] https://disclosures-clerk.house.gov/public_disc/ptr-pdfs/2021/20018011.pdf https://disclosures-clerk.house.gov/public_disc/ptr-pdfs/202... [2] https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/TSLA/history/ https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/TSLA/history/ [3] https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/TSLA220318C00500000?p=TSLA220318C00500000 https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/TSLA220318C00500000?p=TSLA22... [4] https://disclosures-clerk.house.gov/PublicDisclosure/FinancialDisclosure https://disclosures-clerk.house.gov/PublicDisclosure/Financi...