4 ms·

So she wrote all of the borderline bad things under her unique account, but not the really bad things. Sure. Let's give her that benefit of the doubt.

wizzwizz4 5y ago
> under her unique account, It's Disqus; it doesn't work like that. Anyone can use any username. > So she wrote all of the borderline bad things I like them as much as you do (possibly less), but a large proportion of the US population has been radicalised in this way. It's not so cut and dry as I'd like these situations to be. (I'd delete that kind of thing if I were moderating, though; that's an obvious thing to do.)
- mikeyouse 5y ago
  > It's Disqus; it doesn't work like that. Anyone can use any username. Nah, if you click through a username, you can see where else they commented if they're logged in. And the chances of her leaving comments with that login at Breitbart / Drudge Report but not Gateway Pundit are so vanishingly small to not even consider. But yeah, most of her really off-the-rails stuff was at properties the Nieman Labs guy didn't control so he couldn't delete, it seems like she wrote dumb nonsense on his page partially identifying herself and then he just clicked through to read the rest of her garbage she was writing all over the internet about every silly right-wing conspiracy theory du jour.
- ceejayoz 5y ago
  > It's Disqus; it doesn't work like that. Anyone can use any username. https://help.disqus.com/en/articles/1717153-registering-a-commenter-account https://help.disqus.com/en/articles/1717153-registering-a-co...
  - wizzwizz4 5y ago
    Huh. Guess there's no moral dilemma then.
  - nitrogen 5y ago
    > Note that usernames are only for login and moderation purposes, and you have the option to display a different name with your comments after you have finished registering. Is this what they were referring to?
    - ceejayoz 5y ago
      I think they were referring to the guest commenting option. https://help.disqus.com/en/articles/1717211-guest-commenting https://help.disqus.com/en/articles/1717211-guest-commenting
    - mikeyouse 5y ago
      Nah, this part: > Usernames must be unique and can only be registered by one commenter at a time. If you are seeing this message, it means your desired username is already taken, and you should try registering a different name. The journalist didn't just google that username and assume everything he read was from her or something, he simply clicked on her linked account in the Disqus system and read/screenshot what else she posted. She's obviously lying when she said that the racist comments, but only the racist ones were written by someone else.
      - ALittleLight 5y ago
        Not clear. Suppose she has a spouse, roommate, son, friend, etc who uses the same computer and since her account is automatically logged in, comments from the same account. If she could bring someone who would say "Yes, I wrote that on her account" or show that the time of the comment she was teaching or something - I think that would be pretty compelling.
deleted 5y ago
[deleted]

wizzwizz4 5y ago

> under her unique account, It's Disqus; it doesn't work like that. Anyone can use any username. > So she wrote all of the borderline bad things I like them as much as you do (possibly less), but a large proportion of the US population has been radicalised in this way. It's not so cut and dry as I'd like these situations to be. (I'd delete that kind of thing if I were moderating, though; that's an obvious thing to do.)

mikeyouse 5y ago
> It's Disqus; it doesn't work like that. Anyone can use any username. Nah, if you click through a username, you can see where else they commented if they're logged in. And the chances of her leaving comments with that login at Breitbart / Drudge Report but not Gateway Pundit are so vanishingly small to not even consider. But yeah, most of her really off-the-rails stuff was at properties the Nieman Labs guy didn't control so he couldn't delete, it seems like she wrote dumb nonsense on his page partially identifying herself and then he just clicked through to read the rest of her garbage she was writing all over the internet about every silly right-wing conspiracy theory du jour.
ceejayoz 5y ago
> It's Disqus; it doesn't work like that. Anyone can use any username. https://help.disqus.com/en/articles/1717153-registering-a-commenter-account https://help.disqus.com/en/articles/1717153-registering-a-co...
- wizzwizz4 5y ago
  Huh. Guess there's no moral dilemma then.
- nitrogen 5y ago
  > Note that usernames are only for login and moderation purposes, and you have the option to display a different name with your comments after you have finished registering. Is this what they were referring to?
  - ceejayoz 5y ago
    I think they were referring to the guest commenting option. https://help.disqus.com/en/articles/1717211-guest-commenting https://help.disqus.com/en/articles/1717211-guest-commenting
  - mikeyouse 5y ago
    Nah, this part: > Usernames must be unique and can only be registered by one commenter at a time. If you are seeing this message, it means your desired username is already taken, and you should try registering a different name. The journalist didn't just google that username and assume everything he read was from her or something, he simply clicked on her linked account in the Disqus system and read/screenshot what else she posted. She's obviously lying when she said that the racist comments, but only the racist ones were written by someone else.
    - ALittleLight 5y ago
      Not clear. Suppose she has a spouse, roommate, son, friend, etc who uses the same computer and since her account is automatically logged in, comments from the same account. If she could bring someone who would say "Yes, I wrote that on her account" or show that the time of the comment she was teaching or something - I think that would be pretty compelling.

deleted 5y ago

[deleted]