2 ms·
Also, it should be noted that all such acts are in violation of the 2A (because the latter says nothing about hunting, sporting, or even self-defense).
by Koshkin 5y ago
Also, it should be noted that all such acts are in violation of the 2A (because the latter says nothing about hunting, sporting, or even self-defense).
- gameman144 5y ago> Also, it should be noted that all such acts are in violation of the 2A Wait, are you saying that hunting/sporting/self-defense are in violation of the second amendment, or am I misunderstanding? Because that's certainly untrue. There's a difference between certain rights not being enumerated in the Constitution and those rights violating the Constitution.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- castlecrasher2 5y agoI misread at first, too, but I believe they mean that gun control laws, particularly ones that cite hunting/sporting/self-defense, are in violation of the 2A.
- gameman144 5y agoAh, that makes way more sense, thanks!