2 ms·

> "I don't see anywhere people are saying it was actually SWAT or any kind of "raid"." The article uses this picture: https://static.techspot.com/images2/news/

> "I don't see anywhere people are saying it was actually SWAT or any kind of "raid"." The article uses this picture: https://static.techspot.com/images2/news/bigimage/2019/03/2019-03-30-image-11-j.webp https://static.techspot.com/images2/news/bigimage/2019/03/20... Google reverse image search for that suggests a search term of "fbi swat team" and first result is a wikipedia link to "FBI Special Weapons and Tactics Teams". The picture is from the Wikipedia page on swatting which says it is "an FBI SWAT team during training". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatting

unishark 5y ago
Yes it's clearly not a photo of the actual event. Are you complaining that you were misled? or are you suggesting "techbase" uses of stock photos is more authoritative than their own primary sources which I just summarized for you?
- jodrellblank 5y ago
  You said "I don't see anywhere people are saying it was actually SWAT" and I'm pointing you to where the article implies actual SWAT was involved, with their use of a photo of an actual SWAT team.