5 ms·
Exactly. Disagreement, even a stronge disagreement with peoples opinions or actions does not require or even permit personal attacks. I do like changes done to
by maverwa 5y ago
Exactly. Disagreement, even a stronge disagreement with peoples opinions or actions does not require or even permit personal attacks. I do like changes done to audcity, but I dislike calling people "scumbags" or stuff like that.
- antisol 5y agoI'd argue that the post contains no personal attacks, only descriptive terms.
- happytoexplain 5y agoAssuming you're referring to the same writing the parent is, "scumbag" is, at the logical minimum, both a personal attack and a descriptive term.
- Ygg2 5y agoWould replacing scumbags with fuckers work for you? Because shipping people to CCP for criticizing you, is scumbags at minimum.
- Ygg2 5y agoSince last message was flagged, please explain to me, how is shipping people to CCP is considered a "strong disagreement". That's like saying Nazi's were a bit naughty. Or that inside of an active star is lukewarm. It's an outright lie. If anything GP was very temperate in their response.
- antisol 5y agoI guess it depends on your perspective. For example, if you work for musescore... ;)