4 ms·

First, if a state requires internet connectivity then it's their responsibility to provide it. Second, just because somone's being forced to need something does

First, if a state requires internet connectivity then it's their responsibility to provide it. Second, just because somone's being forced to need something doesn't mean they don't ultimately value something else more. Third, even valuing your survival over destruction of the commons is a subjective preference, so yeah, it's always subjective. Anyway, this all needs to be worked out demoratically with all information and options, not by authoritarians forcing limited choices onto people.

sumedh 5y ago
> if a state requires internet connectivity then it's their responsibility to provide it. That sounds good on paper but it does now work like that in real life, in India or the US people who live far away from metro regions, providing connectivity is not an important topic for getting votes so you wont see politicians fighting for it. So Democracy is not going to solve that. I dont know about you but if there is a question about my survival then its not subjective to me, maybe you dont value your life but I do.