3 ms·

Here's some more on this: https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/7190/gpl-exceptions-that-only-apply-to-certain-individuals https://opensource.stackexc

Here's some more on this: https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/7190/gpl-exceptions-that-only-apply-to-certain-individuals https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/7190/gpl-exce... Q14 on https://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html https://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html https://debian-legal.debian.narkive.com/HciZR18l/nmap-licensing-claims https://debian-legal.debian.narkive.com/HciZR18l/nmap-licens... My impression is that enacting the termination clause of GPL makes Stockfish non-DSFG. If the Stockfish developers believe a party has broken the terms of a license, they can do any of: * enact the termination clause, and thus make Stockfish non-DSFG * raise a court case against the party for breach of license The Stockfish developers happen to have done both.

yoyoplayer 5y ago
http://cardozolawreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/GREENBAUM.37.4.pdf http://cardozolawreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/GREEN... states: "Notwithstanding this literal understanding of the license terms, the harshest constructions of the termination provisions of the GPL have not been enforced in practice." Even if it was tested in one jurisdiction, it might not apply in others.