3 ms·
> It's just that the actual manufacturing does not exist (or rather is done by compiler) Here’s the kicker though: The part that is done by compilers used to b
by Swizec 5y ago
> It's just that the actual manufacturing does not exist (or rather is done by compiler)
Here’s the kicker though: The part that is done by compilers used to be the bulk of software engineering.
In his Art and Science book Hamming talks about how programmers rejected the idea of even just automated address assignment. They took great pride in manually managing absolute addressing. Only a sissy who doesn’t know real programming would ever use something so silly as symbolic addressing, to say nothing of compiling from assembly. Ugh!
Now we don’t even think about that. Too boring, too solved, too uncreative.
There is a lot of engineering that we currently do, which is completely mechanical, mindless, and can be automated away.
- 310ke 5y agoIt seems to go something like this every time: * We create new technology. * There's an explosion of creativity and applications of the technology. * This leads to an explosion in the personalities involved. * Some of these gravitate towards the tedium and expound on it constantly. * Some person or group automates that away and increases the ability to be creative. * Repeat from the top. It's always fun to watch the wheel go around though. Never any shortage of commentary on HN about it!