Curation and what you leave out speaks volumes. Apparently, in all their listed Strides, zero mention is just right. Asians are about 14.6% of California. Lead

Curation and what you leave out speaks volumes. Apparently, in all their listed Strides, zero mention is just right. Asians are about 14.6% of California. Leading with > So? It doesn’t purport to enumerate groups that exist, it identifies groups for which it contends structural barriers in pre-existing approaches for which corrective measures are proposed. And those groups identified overlap Asians, though Asians qua Asians aren’t among them (the groups are Black, Latinx, and multilingual students.) ...is cold comfort. > But since you raise that document, on the more substantive hand, it’s notable that a standard conservative complaint about common teaching methods allegedly encountered under “Common Core” standards (which is not a feature of the standards themselves) is present as one of the features of “white supremacy” in teaching against which the document is directed. And what is this about American conservatism? I'm talking about whether Asians should go completely unmentioned in a policy document on racial equity for Californian math pedagogy. And Asians are not necessarily US conservatives, especially with respect to funding public education.