3 ms·

> For you to say 'All reports' is straight up dishonest No. We’re taking about how the computer works. Not the occasional faulty unit. > when people have re

• rvz 5y ago
  > No. We’re taking about how the computer works. Not the occasional faulty unit. And the computer needs system software to run properly to be usable, otherwise it is useless on its own and cannot boot anyway. If the system software is causing issues, you update it. On launch day, that was broken and so was recovery when they launched. > If you had evidence that M1 Macs have a greater failure rate than their competitors, you would have presented it. So in November 2020, 'All reports are that the M1 Macs work extremely well?' Typically, that includes the default install of the system software upon purchase that can only be macOS for M1 Macs and for it to be "usable" it 'must be switched on' and the only way to control and update the hardware is via system software on the machine. Otherwise it is useless. If 'All' reports were that M1 Macs worked extremely well, I would not be seeing such frequent issues or reports mentioned anywhere on launch day or a month after. That was not the case. The author of this post has the evidence themselves and does not hide the issues that happened on launch day and for several months on end.