2 ms·
> aren't you supposed to have a master, when you're working with koans? Buddha is my master, teacher and guide, etc. This is all sorts of hilarious from a Zen
by eurasiantiger 5y ago
> aren't you supposed to have a master, when you're working with koans?
Buddha is my master, teacher and guide, etc. This is all sorts of hilarious from a Zen perspective; interpreting Tathagatagarbha as monism, or Buddha as anything, heh.
- rtikulit 5y ago“A teacher when one is required, no teacher when one is not required,“ or something like that. :) The Buddha is an existence proof of the possibility of direct independent observation and understanding.
- denton-scratch 5y agoA unique point of evidence, 3,500 years old. Not really "proof" of anything. And as a teacher, The Buddha has certain limitations - like when you ask him "I'm having problems - am I doing this right?" - answer came there none.
- eurasiantiger 5y agoWhat about pratyekabuddhas? And why would one expect The Buddha to have an answer other than The Buddha? Sincerely, a stream-enterer.
- denton-scratch 5y agoI was told that pratyekabuddhas are rather odd, and very rare.
- eurasiantiger 5y agoRarity is a matter of perception — at the time of the Teaching, the population of the world was a hundred times smaller. Oddity can be attested to, but what was once a rarity is now a minority statistic. As much as the population has multiplied, the number of pratyekabuddhas must have risen in tandem: to suggest otherwise would be to assign pratyekabuddhahood to external entities or mechanisms as something bestowed upon someone, but as it is, pratyekabuddhas arise independently — were that not the case, would they still be pratyekabuddhas?