All work relationships of employement fit into a relationship of subordination. Actually, where I live here they are legally recognized in the framework of a re

All work relationships of employement fit into a relationship of subordination. Actually, where I live here they are legally recognized in the framework of a relationship of subordination. They're fundamentally a relationship where the worker is subservient to the employer. There are exceptions, yes. But they are the exceptions that proves the rule. Of course if you work for yourself or if you work as the owner of a company then you're not oppressing yourself, but that's not what people mean when they say "work under capitalism". All in all I think it is a fine starting point for the argument they made, and it can be "repaired" even if you precise a lot more.