> I don't think they'd go that far as to intentionally denying Firefox users access to their sites even if they wanted, because that'd immediately draw some law

> I don't think they'd go that far as to intentionally denying Firefox users access to their sites even if they wanted, because that'd immediately draw some lawsuits. This already happened, some sites wouldn't work in Firefox unless Firefox had the Chrome user agent string. Also who is going to sue them? Firefox? That's like kicking yourself in the balls.