4 ms·
I think you're making a lot of assumptions. > I'm saying most criticisms I've seen are much broader than that, and if that world view was true, neither option
by codyswann 5y ago
I think you're making a lot of assumptions.
> I'm saying most criticisms I've seen are much broader than that, and if that world view was true, neither option would exist in the first place.
Not the case for me
> billionaires who shouldn't exist in the first place
100% your opinion and is completely separate from the criticism that billionaires should spend their wealth solving earth's problems
So you had a completely different question than the "journalist." Get upset that this journalist didn't answer the question you wanted asked, but don't speak for the rest of the viewership.
- cassianoleal 5y ago> Not the case for me Fair enough. I did say "most criticisms I've seen". > 100% your opinion That may or may not be the case. It's not what I'm arguing about though. I'm saying it doesn't match the meat of the debate I have seen. When you said "not the case for me", that's definitely a relevant data point. The rest of this thread is not.