3 ms·
Meanwhile, you can't walk two blocks in SF without seeing a Cruise or Waymo car, and those are driving thousands of miles between disengagments. This looks like
by SheinhardtWigCo 5y ago
Meanwhile, you can't walk two blocks in SF without seeing a Cruise or Waymo car, and those are driving thousands of miles between disengagments. This looks like a hobby project in comparison.
- jacquesm 5y agoFielding this with other users on public roads that have expressly not opted in to this is criminal.
- mavhc 5y agoPublic roads are full of HumanDrive Betas that are learning to drive. And release version HumanDrivers who kill 3000 people per day. It seems to cope find with moderately busy streets https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtPGTOJ5Nks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtPGTOJ5Nks
- jacquesm 5y agoThey are accompanied by instructors who have passed extra education to make sure that they can safely participate. I live in the examination territory for my region, in a country where you need to do some serious learning before you're allowed on the road in a car.
- mavhc 5y agoAnd Tesla Driver is accompanied by a human who a) doesn't want to die and b) doesn't want their expensive car broken. Have any FSD beta Teslas crashed?
- jacquesm 5y agoIf not for the reactionspeed of the guy making that video there were two instances already, one where the car suddenly swerved right into another car, another where it aimed for a concrete pillar. Seriously, watch the video. Human not wanting to die is the default, but should not be a requirement for something labelled 'full self driving'.
- mavhc 5y agoI watched it a day ago. It's not labelled full self driving, it's labelled full self driving beta "warning, the car may do the worst thing at the worst time, be alert" What would be useful is to get the debug report, what it thought it was doing, what it was planning to do in the next second, would it have crashed?