4 ms·
Sounds like a DR test; spin up an entire new thing to make sure the backups worked, then turn it off. Costs a few hours of extra resources.
by Godel_unicode 5y ago
Sounds like a DR test; spin up an entire new thing to make sure the backups worked, then turn it off. Costs a few hours of extra resources.
- dspillett 5y agoI do something similar with my home mail server (not sure I'd go with self-hosting if I started fresh today, but it has run without issue other than maintenance for upgrades & such for well over a decade). I have a second copy running in a low spec VM. Every day it wipes itself down and restores the latest backup, I check regularly (a couple of times per week) to see that it is running and has copies of recent mail (that part could be more automated but I've never go round to it...). It wasn't setup for DR specifically, but it is on a separate network so if push came to shove I could ramp up its resources, change a few DNS settings, open up relevant bits of its firewalling, and have it take over, if the main server failed in a way it hadn't copied yet.
- rhizome 5y agoCould be; it's ambiguous. But yeah, not updating DNS could be just declining to test operation in the wilds of outside traffic before tearing it all down. That said, in this way, maybe a periodic "DR" that actually replaces the current operations would be a helpful...well, not test, but..."resilience practice" maybe? It could be a new twist on continuous deployment: continuous recovery.