3 ms·
> We have tons of direct evidence for 'Natural Origin' Tons, huh? So if that is the case then why is the WHO backpedaling [0] on the premature zoonotic classif
by sennight 5y ago
> We have tons of direct evidence for 'Natural Origin'
Tons, huh? So if that is the case then why is the WHO backpedaling [0] on the premature zoonotic classification, after ignoring everyone pointing out the fact that it was premature from the get-go? Did the "facts" change again? It never gets old, watching Tedros erode institutional trust.
> If you have actual evidence about something, then make your public claim so that it can be scrutinized.
I think I'll wait for you to break off a piece of that "tons" of evidence first. I'm really looking forward to you backing up the whole bat-soup/peed-in-my-mouth story with good solid evidence.
[0] https://www.npr.org/2021/07/15/1016436749/who-chief-wuhan-lab-covid-19-origin-premature-tedros https://www.npr.org/2021/07/15/1016436749/who-chief-wuhan-la...