15 ms·
> The US is doing good because its ICUs are not full and emergency services are not stressed into nonexistence Most (>90%) ICUs in the US were never full, and
by hatware 5y ago
> The US is doing good because its ICUs are not full and emergency services are not stressed into nonexistence
Most (>90%) ICUs in the US were never full, and LA county is an anomaly. To your points, shouldn't California have been more prepared for this...? It's almost like the politicians there weren't serving the citizens at all.
Do I need to post every single inconsistency from the last year in order for you to civilly discuss one point I've brought up, or do you want to keep dancing around calling me a conspiracy theorist without actually doing it?
You're using fallacies and I'm trying to open up a dialogue that is pretty rare around these parts. Try and keep up.
>the US isn't open simply because the PCR testing cycles changes could report fewer cases.
The US is open because it is politically expedient. You can have another opinion if you want, but attacking mine and my character blindly is pretty childish.
Keep censoring others, you'll be a good little servant to your tyrants.
- vmception 5y agoCalifornia messed up, many places had completely incorrect pandemic mitigations. LA keeping people indoors in dense mixed unit housing was suboptimal. Which specific point would you like to discuss? I dont feel the same way you do about this conversation and I thought we were at the point where you reply about the other countries that would have been following PCR cycle guidelines too, unless that was considered a fallacy you were referring to.