4 ms·
Yes, Kind of. I think calling it MIT overall would be a little misleading, If you look closely Microsoft has clearly mentioned what part of the code is released
by Anunayj 5y ago
Yes, Kind of. I think calling it MIT overall would be a little misleading, If you look closely Microsoft has clearly mentioned what part of the code is released under what license, like for example looking at linux-firmware specification [1]. Added commits to Linux are under GPLv2 (as they have to be), The build script itself is under MIT, while added drivers and under their own respective licenses. Same is true for all bundled packages. List here [2].
So it's more of a Licensed under MIT unless otherwise stated.
[1]. https://github.com/microsoft/CBL-Mariner/blob/1.0/SPECS/linux-firmware/linux-firmware.spec https://github.com/microsoft/CBL-Mariner/blob/1.0/SPECS/linu...
[2]. https://github.com/microsoft/CBL-Mariner/blob/1.0/SPECS/LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/LICENSES-MAP.md https://github.com/microsoft/CBL-Mariner/blob/1.0/SPECS/LICE...