5 ms·
Since the telemetry is opt-in, some people disagree that Audacity should be called "spyware" for including it as an option. From the original pull request: > T
by commoner 5y ago
Since the telemetry is opt-in, some people disagree that Audacity should be called "spyware" for including it as an option. From the original pull request:
> Telemetry is strictly optional and disabled by default. No data is shared unless you choose to opt-in and enable telemetry.
https://github.com/audacity/audacity/pull/835 https://github.com/audacity/audacity/pull/835
Ars Technica published an article describing the controversy as "massively overblown" and I agree with their analysis:
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/07/no-open-source-audacity-audio-editor-is-not-spyware/ https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/07/no-open-source-audac...
- blooalien 5y ago> Since the telemetry is opt-in, some people disagree that Audacity should be called "spyware" … I could totally see that I guess… My point was more that the way folks reacted to that would probably be a pretty accurate indicator of how well "open source spyware" would be likely received. ;)