4 ms·

Citation needed. Given how much your claim flies in the face of established and widely accepted scientific claims, preferably citations to peer reviewed resear

• willmadden 5y ago
  How do these "established and widely accepted scientific claims" explain why oil wells are filling back up? "Established and widely accepted scientific claims" are often nothing more than political propaganda, in this case propaganda originating with Standard Oil, the Rockefellers, and the even older money that backed that empire. Oil being non-renewable justifies overregulation by governments and price gouging by producers. I'll leave you to do your own research.
  • eloff 5y ago
    > How do these "established and widely accepted scientific claims" explain why oil wells are filling back up? Rocks are variably porous. It wouldn't surprise me at all to exploit a well until production is low, wait a period of time, and find there's small amounts of newly accessible oil there. Oil could maybe get squeezed out of the surrounding rock by the pressure differential crated by removing the oil in the first place. I don't know if that's true though, it's just a theory of mine. The success of fracking lends some credence to it.
    • dredmorbius 5y ago
      Note that hydrofracking literally works by using high-pressure water to expande cracks in the oil-bearing rock layer, then wedging bits of sand into the cracks to hold them open. Wellhead pressure (or lack thereof) is another major aspect of drilling and well production. Early "gushers" would spout 100s of feet (30--60m) into the air, spewing thousands of barrels of oil a day. Pressures could be ... immense (I've lost track of a cite I had for maximum recorded, though it was large). Mature or less-prolific wells have far less reservoir pressure and rely on slow seepage through what's actually mostly-solid rock. "Stripper" wells operated by pump-jacks may return only 10--15 barrels of oil per day. As the price of oil (or electricity necessary to run the pumps) rises and falls, these wells are literally turned on and off due to being only marginally economically profitable. Fracked petroleum wells have an operational life of ~10 years, possibly less. There are traditional wells still pumping strong after 80+ years. The First Oil Well, Bahrain, has been supplying oil since 1931, 90 years: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Oil_Well,_Bahrain https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Oil_Well,_Bahrain
• dredmorbius 5y ago
  Post history suggests further inquiry is unlikely to be useful.
  • willmadden 5y ago
    Like claiming SARS-2 CoV came from a lab before the mainstream media admitted it came from a lab?
    • klyrs 5y ago
      A quick skim of your comments shows that you consider yourself to be better informed than the majority of scientists in several fields. How did you become an expert in so many areas of study, and why are you having so much trouble convincing your peers of the truth?
      • willmadden 5y ago
        I prefer track record over appeals to authority. So far I correctly predicted that SARS-2 originated in a lab before it was acceptable to have that view. My only other outlandish predictions are climate related: that the earth isn't warming, it's cooling, that CO2 isn't a major driver of climate change (vs. water and the sun), and that oil is mostly a renewable resource. Let's see if I'm 2/2 in 10 or 20 years.
        • dang 5y ago
          Your account seems to be using HN only to get involved in flamewars about ideologically contentious topics. Can you please not do that? It's not the kind of site we're trying for here. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
    • beowulfey 5y ago
      Mmm, get me some more of that red herring to go with this delicious wine.