3 ms·
As more of a layperson, I have mixed feelings. As science journalism goes, it's excellent, but reading this sort of frontier news feels like a waste of time to
by abecedarius 5y ago
As more of a layperson, I have mixed feelings. As science journalism goes, it's excellent, but reading this sort of frontier news feels like a waste of time to me now. I only really found out that progress is being made in fields I don't understand. I bothered to check this article out because multiple people posted that it's very good, but the time I spent reading it would've been better put into getting a little bit more real understanding of old related discoveries like the unsolvability of the quintic, which is within reach at my level.
- TheOtherHobbes 5y agoI think that's more about the content than the writing. This is an incredibly esoteric topic which is only really of professional relevance to maybe a couple of hundred people in the world. Given that, I think the writing did an excellent job of making it sound interesting and almost accessible. In comparison quintics are a two hundred year old puzzle and not a two year old puzzle, so it's easy to find explanations elsewhere.
- abecedarius 5y agoYes. I have a couple of relevant books checked out from the library, actually. But I wish I hadn't sort of defaulted to reading way too much pop science over the decades. Diminishing returns set in long ago.