One thing that gets me about GANs is that whatever approach is used to generate the outputs always results in GAN-look; these images always look “fuzzy” and obj

One thing that gets me about GANs is that whatever approach is used to generate the outputs always results in GAN-look; these images always look “fuzzy” and objects have “hairy” boundaries which I suspect is the result of some common gradient function technique blending the output in ways that are identifiably artificial. Plenty of photographs have crisp object definitions in the real world. These do not. Trees blend into humans standing on the beach.