3 ms·

The congress party signing an MOU is public information, but the contents are secrets.

by naruvimama 5y ago

srean 5y ago
In other words, there is nothing relevant that you can substantiate by citing a credible source. Got it.
- naruvimama 5y ago
  The congress party itself put out pictures and press release of them signing an MOU. If you need more proof, you can try Pegasus perhaps?
  - srean 5y ago
    The key word you missed is 'relevant'. Signing MOU is not a crime and neither is it relevant to the discussion. You alleged Kishor of trying to fomenting riots, lets see some credible substantiation of that.
    - naruvimama 5y ago
      Yeah signing an MOU with China while we are at war with them. Even a child would know the congress can not be trusted. I see where you might be coming from, the far left So here is a gem of a discussion, https://youtu.be/matXpPAHao4 https://youtu.be/matXpPAHao4
      - srean 5y ago
        I note that you still haven't substantiated your allegation about Kishor. Congress declared and fought a war with China when they had encroached, quite unlike Modi who has for the most part been trying hard to ignore and hide Chinese settlements well within Indian territory in Arunachal Pradesh. Had been denying the fact that Chinese forces has occupied Indian territory several kilometers inside Indian border. Oh forgot, yes Modi retaliated occupation of territorial land by banning some video apps and games.
        naruvimama 5y ago
        You keep throwing statements that amount to "Modi is a monster" without proof. Kishore runs an agency that helps Politicians win elections, if I go by the recent West Bengal elections and the subsequent violence against and ethnic cleansing of Hindus from several part of the state, I would hold him at least partly responsible.
        srean 5y ago
        And the evidence of ethnic cleansing is what exactly ? And a link to me calling Modi a monster please.
        naruvimama 5y ago
        NHRC report: https://youtu.be/E7WLeVxTvus https://youtu.be/E7WLeVxTvus Blaming Modi for the Gujarat riots. Even though it is sufficiently proved that the whole progrom was planned and executed by Muslims by burning alive 59 Hindu pilgrims.
        srean 5y ago
        It seems you are incapable of justifying all the relevant and egregious claim you have been making on this thread (Understandable, because they are made up for spreading a fake political narrative). You just made a claim about ethnic cleansing in Bengal. I called you out to provide reliable and credible source. Please provide reliable and credible sources that indicate ethnic cleansing in Bengal. Your other allegation was that I have called Modi a monster. In spite of calling that out, you yet as usual fail to back up your allegations. Again, so understandable and predictable. By doing this repeatedly you are just exposing your kind to the rest to see and make up their own mind on who is telling the truth. For claims I have made on this thread I have pointed to sources. I will end the thread here.
        naruvimama 5y ago
        We are on the opposite ends of the political spectrum and I do not believe I am going to convince you with facts. Your past comments makes me believe that you are part of the crowd that is on a witch hunt of Modi. Even though he has been through the trials since 2002, when the congress was still very much in power and has been cleared of any wrong doing. At the same time you claim to want hard evidence on violence both political and communal in West Bengal. The NHRC has submitted a damning report on the situation in WB. Let Kishor go through the same trial that Modi went through to clear his name. Until then I would hold him responsible for spreading hate and causing disharmony, if not actually mobilizing and orchestrating the violence.
      - addicted 5y ago
        Lol, India is not at war with China. Thanks to the fact that Modi cannot admit that China has already taken over significant tracts of Indian land, because that would mean admitting that a 56in chest is meaningless when it comes to actual diplomacy, international relations, and the ability to defend ones country.

The congress party signing an MOU is public information, but the contents are secrets.

srean 5y ago

In other words, there is nothing relevant that you can substantiate by citing a credible source. Got it.

naruvimama 5y ago
The congress party itself put out pictures and press release of them signing an MOU. If you need more proof, you can try Pegasus perhaps?
- srean 5y ago
  The key word you missed is 'relevant'. Signing MOU is not a crime and neither is it relevant to the discussion. You alleged Kishor of trying to fomenting riots, lets see some credible substantiation of that.
  - naruvimama 5y ago
    Yeah signing an MOU with China while we are at war with them. Even a child would know the congress can not be trusted. I see where you might be coming from, the far left So here is a gem of a discussion, https://youtu.be/matXpPAHao4 https://youtu.be/matXpPAHao4
    - srean 5y ago
      I note that you still haven't substantiated your allegation about Kishor. Congress declared and fought a war with China when they had encroached, quite unlike Modi who has for the most part been trying hard to ignore and hide Chinese settlements well within Indian territory in Arunachal Pradesh. Had been denying the fact that Chinese forces has occupied Indian territory several kilometers inside Indian border. Oh forgot, yes Modi retaliated occupation of territorial land by banning some video apps and games.
      - naruvimama 5y ago
        You keep throwing statements that amount to "Modi is a monster" without proof. Kishore runs an agency that helps Politicians win elections, if I go by the recent West Bengal elections and the subsequent violence against and ethnic cleansing of Hindus from several part of the state, I would hold him at least partly responsible.
        srean 5y ago
        And the evidence of ethnic cleansing is what exactly ? And a link to me calling Modi a monster please.
        naruvimama 5y ago
        NHRC report: https://youtu.be/E7WLeVxTvus https://youtu.be/E7WLeVxTvus Blaming Modi for the Gujarat riots. Even though it is sufficiently proved that the whole progrom was planned and executed by Muslims by burning alive 59 Hindu pilgrims.
        srean 5y ago
        It seems you are incapable of justifying all the relevant and egregious claim you have been making on this thread (Understandable, because they are made up for spreading a fake political narrative). You just made a claim about ethnic cleansing in Bengal. I called you out to provide reliable and credible source. Please provide reliable and credible sources that indicate ethnic cleansing in Bengal. Your other allegation was that I have called Modi a monster. In spite of calling that out, you yet as usual fail to back up your allegations. Again, so understandable and predictable. By doing this repeatedly you are just exposing your kind to the rest to see and make up their own mind on who is telling the truth. For claims I have made on this thread I have pointed to sources. I will end the thread here.
        naruvimama 5y ago
        We are on the opposite ends of the political spectrum and I do not believe I am going to convince you with facts. Your past comments makes me believe that you are part of the crowd that is on a witch hunt of Modi. Even though he has been through the trials since 2002, when the congress was still very much in power and has been cleared of any wrong doing. At the same time you claim to want hard evidence on violence both political and communal in West Bengal. The NHRC has submitted a damning report on the situation in WB. Let Kishor go through the same trial that Modi went through to clear his name. Until then I would hold him responsible for spreading hate and causing disharmony, if not actually mobilizing and orchestrating the violence.
    - addicted 5y ago
      Lol, India is not at war with China. Thanks to the fact that Modi cannot admit that China has already taken over significant tracts of Indian land, because that would mean admitting that a 56in chest is meaningless when it comes to actual diplomacy, international relations, and the ability to defend ones country.