Best effort: > Wow, a lot of comments. What Fullstaq Ruby is doing is difficult to add into mainline, so my overall impression is I'm thankful someone's going

Best effort: > Wow, a lot of comments. What Fullstaq Ruby is doing is difficult to add into mainline, so my overall impression is I'm thankful someone's going to the trouble of doing it themselves. > It's not quite right to say that on Linux with jemalloc it uses less memory. In reality, it would be more correct to say that using a super-old version of jemalloc that for some reason used less memory leads to reduced memory usage (for unknown reasons). So it can't go into mainline. > That said, I can understand that some people are just happy to see reduced memory usage, so if those people want to keep using the super-old version of jemalloc with reduced memory usage, I have no objection. Go for it, is my feeling.