3 ms·
I estimate the risk of human error (chose the wrong modeling assumptions, bug in data processing code, etc.) at least ~1%, so there really isn't any point in cl
by brilee 5y ago
I estimate the risk of human error (chose the wrong modeling assumptions, bug in data processing code, etc.) at least ~1%, so there really isn't any point in claiming any statistic that is smaller than that.
- native_samples 5y agoP values in particle physics are much, much lower than the base human error rate though. Unless you think those are wrong?